By SEOENV Team | Published October 23, 2026
This link building case study walks through a six-month campaign for a fictional B2B software site, from choosing target pages to measuring results. All figures are example data, not real client results, so you can see how decisions are made without inflated claims. The short version: pick a few target pages, size the gap against competitors, start with quick wins, build one asset and measure results on the pages you targeted.
Key takeaways
- This is an illustrative case study with example data.
- It starts with target pages and a gap analysis.
- Quick wins fund time for a linkable asset.
- Results are measured on target pages, not total links.
- Tracking reveals lost links worth recovering.

The situation (example data)
| Item | Example value |
|---|---|
| Site | B2B scheduling software |
| Referring domains | 85 |
| Target pages | 3 feature pages, positions 8-18 |
| Competitors on page one | 40-120 referring domains to equivalent pages |
| Budget | One person, 2 days a week |
Step 1: gap analysis
| Target page | Our referring domains | Top 3 competitor median | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shift scheduling | 4 | 22 | 18 |
| Team calendar | 2 | 15 | 13 |
| Time-off tracking | 1 | 11 | 10 |
See how many backlinks do I need for the method.
Step 2: plan
- Months 1-2: quick wins (partners, unlinked mentions, broken pages).
- Months 2-3: publish a free shift rota template.
- Months 3-6: outreach for the template and guest posts on HR blogs; internal links from template to feature pages.
Step 3: execution (example data)
| Month | Activity | Links live |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 integration partners asked | 7 |
| 1-2 | 9 unlinked mentions | 6 |
| 2 | 5 broken pages redirected | (recovered 11 links) |
| 3 | Template launched, 80 pitches | 10 |
| 4-6 | 6 guest posts on HR blogs | 6 |
| 4-6 | Template earned organically | 9 |
Total new referring domains: 38, plus 11 recovered.
Halfway through, a check showed 5 of the links built in month one had already been lost: two partner pages had been redesigned and three mentions edited. Without checks, the report would have overstated results.
Catch lost links before you report them
SEOENV checks each link's status so reports stay accurate.
Step 4: results (example data)
| Target page | Ref. domains before | After | Position before | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shift scheduling | 4 | 17 | 14 | 6 |
| Team calendar | 2 | 11 | 18 | 9 |
| Time-off tracking | 1 | 8 | 11 | 7 |
Measured with Search Console's Performance report. Ranking changes have many causes; links were one of them.
What worked and what didn't (example)
- Worked: partners and the template.
- Didn't: cold guest post pitches to large publications (2% reply rate).
- Surprise: recovering broken-page links was the fastest win.
Lessons for your own campaign
- Measure on target pages.
- Do quick wins first.
- One good asset beats many thin posts.
- Recheck links before every report.
- Stay within Google's spam policies.
Reporting to stakeholders
Show referring domains to target pages, rankings, organic traffic and lost links recovered. Our report template has a format.
How to run your own link building case study
A case study is only useful if it's honest about inputs, outputs and what you can't attribute. Here's a structure that holds up.
Step 1: set a baseline before you start
Record the starting point for the pages you'll build links to: rankings for target queries, organic clicks from Search Console, referring domains and the number of internal links. Without a baseline, any "result" is a guess.
Step 2: choose a narrow scope
Pick a few target pages rather than the whole site. A narrow scope makes it easier to see whether links moved anything, and easier to spot other changes (content updates, technical fixes) that could explain results.
Step 3: log every link
For each link, record the source URL, target URL, anchor, rel attribute, date live, how it was earned (outreach, guest post, partnership, paid) and cost. This log is the backbone of the case study.
Step 4: log everything else that changed
Content rewrites, internal linking changes, site migrations and Google updates all affect rankings. Note them with dates so you don't credit links for something else.
Step 5: measure at fixed intervals
Check rankings and clicks at 30, 60 and 90 days. Links can take weeks to be crawled and counted, so early readings often look flat.
Step 6: write up what you can and can't claim
Say which pages moved, by how much, and what else changed. If you can't separate the effect of links from a content update, say so.
Template for a link building case study
| Section | What to include |
|---|---|
| Goal | Target pages and the queries they should rank for |
| Baseline | Rankings, clicks, referring domains at start |
| Tactics | How links were earned and how many of each type |
| Link log | Source, target, anchor, rel, date, cost |
| Other changes | Content, technical and algorithm events |
| Results | Rankings and clicks at 30/60/90 days |
| Limits | What can't be attributed to links |
| Cost | Total spend and time, cost per live link |
Example data: a 90-day case study write-up
Everything in this table is invented example data showing how to lay out results.
| Page | Links built | Baseline position | Day 90 position | Baseline monthly clicks | Day 90 monthly clicks | Other changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /pricing-guide/ | 6 | 18 | 9 | 120 | 410 | None |
| /templates/ | 4 | 25 | 14 | 60 | 190 | Content refresh in month 2 |
| /comparison/ | 3 | 11 | 10 | 300 | 320 | None |
| Control page | 0 | 15 | 16 | 200 | 190 | None |
The control page (no links) barely moved, which strengthens the case that links helped the pricing guide. The templates page also had a content refresh, so its gain can't be credited to links alone. The comparison page barely moved despite three links, a useful reminder that links don't guarantee results.
Pitfalls in reading case studies
- Survivorship bias. Agencies publish wins, not the campaigns that did nothing.
- Missing costs. A result without spend and time can't be compared.
- No control. Without a comparison page, seasonality or algorithm updates can masquerade as link impact.
- Vanity metrics. Domain rating gains matter less than clicks and leads.
- Short windows. Two-week results are usually noise.
Checklist before you trust a case study
- Is there a baseline with dates?
- Are the number and type of links stated?
- Are other changes disclosed?
- Is there a control or comparison?
- Are costs and timeframes given?
- Are results measured in clicks or revenue, not just authority scores?
- Does it admit what didn't work?
How to share case study results with clients or stakeholders
Lead with the business outcome (clicks, leads, revenue), then show the link log that supports it. Keep a one-page summary for executives and the full URL-level log for anyone who wants to check the work. Be upfront about limits: if a content refresh happened at the same time, say so. Stakeholders trust a report that admits uncertainty far more than one claiming every gain came from links. Repeat the same format each quarter so results can be compared over time, and keep the raw link log so later case studies can build on it.
How SEOENV handles this
In SEOENV, each target page's links sit under one project. Partners, guest posts and listings have their own modules, and status checks show what's live. Share a read-only link with stakeholders instead of a spreadsheet.
Run your own case study with clean data
Track links by target page and share live reports.
A good case study is honest about what didn't work. Track carefully and you'll have one of your own.
Related reading
- Link Building Strategies: A Complete Playbook for Beginners
- Link Building KPIs
- How to Measure Link Building ROI
- How Many Backlinks Do You Need to Rank? A Practical Way to Estimate
- Link Building Report Template
Sources
- Google Search Central: Search Console Performance report
- Google Search Central: Spam policies (link spam)
How we wrote this
The SEOENV Team wrote this guide from our day-to-day work tracking link exchanges, guest posts and paid placements, and checked the guidance against the sources listed above. Any numbers in worked examples are illustrative example data, not results from a real site or study. We review our guides when Google updates its documentation.
Frequently asked questions
Are these real results?
No. This case study uses example data to illustrate the process.
How long does a link building campaign take to show results?
Often a few months for less competitive pages; longer for competitive terms.
What should a link building case study include?
Starting position, target pages, activities, links built and lost, and results on target pages.
How do I measure link building results?
Referring domains to target pages, rankings, organic traffic and conversions.
Why do links get lost during campaigns?
Pages are redesigned, content edited or sites change. Regular checks catch this.


Leave A Comment